Transparency Report

    Last Updated: April 11, 2026

    WireDog VPN Transparency Report

    WireDog VPN is committed to complete transparency about government and legal requests. This report details all formal requests we have received and our responses.

    What is a Warrant Canary?

    A warrant canary is a regularly updated statement that a company has not received certain types of secret government requests — such as National Security Letters or gag orders — that would otherwise prohibit them from disclosing the request publicly. If the canary statement is removed or stops being updated, it signals to users that such a request may have been received. WireDog publishes and maintains this canary as part of our commitment to transparent operations.

    1. Warrant Canary

    ═════════════ WARRANT CANARY ═════════════

    As of January 26, 2026:

    WireDog Technologies, LLC has NOT received any National Security Letters

    WireDog Technologies, LLC has NOT received any gag orders

    WireDog Technologies, LLC has NOT received any warrants from any government entity

    WireDog Technologies, LLC has NOT been compelled to modify our systems to facilitate surveillance

    WireDog Technologies, LLC has NOT been subject to court orders requiring user data disclosure

    This canary will be updated if our legal circumstances change. If this section is removed or appears to be abandoned, users should assume we have been prevented from publicly discussing legal requests.

    ═════════════════════════════════════════

    2. Our Approach to Legal Requests

    WireDog VPN complies with valid, lawful U.S. legal processes, including subpoenas and court orders. However:

    • We will only disclose data that we actually possess
    • We challenge requests that appear overly broad or lacking in legal authority
    • We will not create new data, access historical records, or reconstruct logs in response to legal requests
    • We notify users of legal requests whenever legally permitted to do so

    3. What We Can/Cannot Provide

    Due to our strict no-logs policy and RAM-only infrastructure:

    Cannot Provide (No Data Exists)

    • ❌ Browsing history or websites visited
    • ❌ Connection logs or session data
    • ❌ IP addresses associated with user activity
    • ❌ DNS queries
    • ❌ Traffic content or metadata
    • ❌ Device identifiers
    • ❌ VPN tunnel payloads

    Can Provide (If We Have It)

    • ✓ Account existence (whether a specific email/account number exists)
    • ✓ Subscription dates and plan information
    • ✓ Account creation date

    This design is intentional. We built WireDog to collect minimal data from the start, ensuring that even under legal compulsion, we have very little to disclose.

    4. Infrastructure Transparency

    • Server Location: 100% United States (multiple geographic regions)
    • Server Architecture: RAM-only servers (no persistent disk storage)
    • Data Persistence: All VPN traffic is non-persistent and wiped on reboot
    • Infrastructure Ownership: Owned and operated by WireDog Technologies, LLC
    • Jurisdiction: All infrastructure subject to U.S. law only
    • Payment Processing: Stripe (U.S.-based)

    5. Security Incidents

    2026: No security incidents reported

    We are committed to transparent disclosure of any security incidents that could affect user data.

    6. Third-Party Services

    WireDog uses the following third-party services:

    • Stripe: Payment processing. Stripe may receive limited payment information.

    We do NOT use:

    • Analytics services (Google Analytics, Mixpanel, etc.)
    • Advertising networks or retargeting services
    • Customer profiling or behavioral tracking services

    For government requests, subpoenas, or other legal inquiries:

    WireDog Technologies, LLC
    Email: [email protected]

    8. Frequently Asked Questions

    Has WireDog ever received a government request for user data?

    No. As stated in our warrant canary above, WireDog Technologies, LLC has not received any National Security Letters, gag orders, warrants, or court orders requiring user data disclosure. If this changes, we will update this page accordingly.

    What happens if WireDog receives a court order or subpoena?

    We comply with valid, lawful U.S. legal processes. However, because we operate RAM-only servers with no persistent logs, the data we can actually produce is extremely limited — account existence, subscription dates, and account creation date only. We cannot produce browsing history, connection logs, IP addresses, or traffic data because that data is never created in the first place.

    Can WireDog be forced to hand over my browsing activity?

    No. Even under legal compulsion, we cannot produce data that does not exist. Our RAM-only infrastructure means no browsing history, DNS queries, connection logs, or IP address associations are ever written to disk. A court order cannot compel us to produce records we have never kept.

    How do I know the warrant canary is still active?

    Check the date on the canary statement above. We update it regularly. If the statement disappears from this page, or if the date has not been updated for an unusually long period, treat it as a signal that our legal circumstances may have changed. We recommend bookmarking this page and checking it periodically.

    Is WireDog subject to U.S. government surveillance programs?

    WireDog operates exclusively under U.S. law and is not subject to foreign jurisdiction. We are potentially subject to U.S. surveillance laws, including FISA. However, our zero-logs architecture means there is no meaningful user data available to collect under any surveillance program — we cannot be compelled to hand over data we do not have.

    Why are WireDog's servers based in the U.S. if that means U.S. law applies?

    We believe operating under U.S. law with full transparency is more trustworthy than routing data through foreign jurisdictions to obscure legal accountability. We know exactly what laws apply to us, we publish that information here, and we design our infrastructure so that legal compliance produces nothing useful. Hiding jurisdiction is not the same as protecting privacy — architecture is.